Stan Parker Stan Parker's Profile Page

Stan Parker Stan Parker

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Test Cost | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Objectives Pdf

What's more, part of that NewPassLeader ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=143DSQrVQAV9udFtX6VzFf9Ye9iEuJ1-L

If you really intend to pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam, our software will provide you the fast and convenient learning and you will get the best study materials and get a very good preparation for the exam. The content of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer guide torrent is easy to be mastered and has simplified the important information. What’s more, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer prep torrent conveys more important information with less questions and answers. The learning is relaxed and highly efficiently.

Passing Score, Duration, No of the questions, languages, Format of the PECB ISO IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Certification Exam

ISO IEC 27001 Lead Implementer exam dumps elaborated well the info about the passing Score, Duration & Questions for the ISO IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Certification Exam. Overview of the info about the PECB ISO IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam is given below:

Exam Format: Multiple choice
Duration: 03 Hours
No. of questions: 80
Passing score: 70%
Languages: English

>> Latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Test Cost <<

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Objectives Pdf, Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Duration

The online version of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions is convenient for you if you are busy at work and traffic. Wherever you are, as long as you have an access to the internet, a smart phone or an I-pad can become your study tool for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam. This version can also provide you with exam simulation. And the good point is that you don't need to install any software or app. All you need is to click the link of the online ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Training Material once, and then you can learn and practice offline.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam Sample Questions (Q30-Q35):

NEW QUESTION # 30
Which of the following is the most suitable option for presenting raw data in a user-friendly, easy-to-read format?

A. Scorecards
B. Reports
C. Gages

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 31
An organization that has an ISMS in place conducts management reviews at planned intervals, but does not retain documented information on the results. Is this in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001?

A. Yes. ISO/IEC 27001 does not require organizations to document the results of management reviews
B. No, ISO/IEC 27001 requires organizations to document the results of management reviews
C. Yes. ISO/IEC 27001 requires organizations to document the results of management reviews only if they are conducted ad hoc

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.3.3, the organization must retain documented information as evidence of the results of management reviews. The results of management reviews must include decisions and actions related to the ISMS policy, objectives, risks, opportunities, resources, and communication.
Documenting the results of management reviews is important to ensure the accountability, traceability, and effectiveness of the ISMS. It also helps the organization to monitor and measure the performance and improvement of the ISMS, and to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Therefore, an organization that has an ISMS in place and conducts management reviews at planned intervals, but does not retain documented information on the results, is not in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. (From the PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 107) References:
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 107
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 7
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (en), Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 9.3.3 1

NEW QUESTION # 32
Why should the security testing processes be defined and implemented in the development life cycle?

A. To Identify organizational assets and define appropriate protection responsibilities
B. To validate if information security requirements are met when applications are deployed to the production environment
C. To protect the production environment and data from compromise by development and test activities

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 33
An organization has justified the exclusion of control 5.18 Access rights of ISO/IEC 27001 in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) as follows: "An access control reader is already installed at the main entrance of the building." Which statement is correct'

A. The justification for the exclusion of a control is not required to be included in the SoA
B. The justification is not acceptable because it does not indicate that it has been selected based on the risk assessment results
C. The justification is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, the Statement of Applicability (SoA) is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable to the organization's ISMS and explains why they are selected or not.
The SoA is based on the results of the risk assessment and risk treatment, which are the previous steps in the risk management process. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of a control should be based on the risk assessment results and the risk treatment plan, and should reflect the purpose and objective of the control.
Control 5.18 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is about access rights to information and other associated assets, which should be provisioned, reviewed, modified and removed in accordance with the organization's topic-specific policy on and rules for access control. The purpose of this control is to prevent unauthorized access to, modification of, and destruction of information assets. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of this control should explain why the organization does not need to implement this control to protect its information assets from unauthorized access.
The justification given by the organization in the question is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18. An access control reader at the main entrance of the building is a physical security measure, which is related to control 5.15 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, not control 5.18. Control 5.18 is about logical access rights to information systems and services, which are not addressed by the access control reader.
Therefore, the organization should either provide a valid justification for the exclusion of control 5.18, or include it in the SoA and implement it according to the risk assessment and risk treatment results.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, control 5.18; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 5, slide 18, Module 6, slide 10.

NEW QUESTION # 34
Scenario 9: CoreBit Systems
CoreBit Systems, with its headquarters m San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions, its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients a smooth transition into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently. John, the internal auditor of CoreBit Systems, conducted an internal audit which uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities, in response to the identified nonconformities. CoreBit Systems decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to solve these issues systematically. The method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of issues. This approach involves several steps. First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root cause of the nonconformities, CoreBit Systems's ISMS project manager.
Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity.
While assessing potential corrective action for addressing a nonconformity, Julia identified the issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its reoccurrence Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Afterward. Julia combined all the nonconformities Into a single action plan and sought approval from the top management.
The submitted action plan was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department.
However. Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process, and notably, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Julia, the ISMS project manager, developed a combined action plan for all nonconformities. However, it was rejected, revised, and resubmitted late-without defined execution schedules.
Question:
Did CoreBit Systems have a plan in place to implement permanent corrective action to address the identified nonconformities?

A. No - CoreBit Systems decided not to pursue this course of action
B. No - CoreBit Systems did not have a clear plan to implement a permanent corrective action
C. Yes - CoreBit Systems had a comprehensive plan in place to implement permanent corrective actions

Answer: B

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 10.2 -Nonconformity and corrective actionrequires:
"Corrective actions shall be implemented without undue delay and include:
- evaluating the need for action to eliminate the cause;
- implementing the necessary actions;
- reviewing the effectiveness;
- updating risks and SoA if needed."
Although Julia drafted an action plan, it was not approved initially, wasresubmitted late, andlacked scheduling-failing to meet key requirements of a "clear and actionable plan."

NEW QUESTION # 35
......

The learning material is open in three excellent formats; PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps PDF, a desktop PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps practice test, and a web-based PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps practice test. PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps is organized by experts while saving the furthest down-the-line plan to them for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam. The sans bug plans have been given to you all to drift through the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certificate exam.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Objectives Pdf: https://www.newpassleader.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer-exam-preparation-materials.html

DOWNLOAD the newest NewPassLeader ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=143DSQrVQAV9udFtX6VzFf9Ye9iEuJ1-L